Sources
  • Home
  • About
    • Objectives
    • About us
    • Organizers
    • Partners
    • Sponsors
    • Online Panels Program
  • Panels
    • Classification of sources
    • Free encyclopedias as sources of scientific information. Manipulation of data
    • What makes a scientist?
    • Citing. Scientometrics databases
    • Authors. Accuracy of scientific information. Priority
  • Participants
  • Papers
  • Resolution and Book
  • Media
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • About
    • Objectives
    • About us
    • Organizers
    • Partners
    • Sponsors
    • Online Panels Program
  • Panels
    • Classification of sources
    • Free encyclopedias as sources of scientific information. Manipulation of data
    • What makes a scientist?
    • Citing. Scientometrics databases
    • Authors. Accuracy of scientific information. Priority
  • Participants
  • Papers
  • Resolution and Book
  • Media
  • Contacts
  • Home
  • Papers
  • Does ‘scientific’ necessarily mean ‘too complicated’? Prof. Michael Billig

Papers

Does ‘scientific’ necessarily mean ‘too complicated’? Prof. Michael Billig

  • By Admin
  • In Papers

Does ‘scientific’ necessarily mean ‘too complicated’? Code of Science vs. Perception.

Prof. Michael Billig — academic of the British Academy, Emeritus Professor of Social Sciences at Loughborough University, working principally in contemporary social psychology although much of his work crosses disciplinary boundaries in the social sciences. His research explored other ways of investigating social psychological issues. His is author of books “Learn to Write Badly: How to Succeed in the Social Sciences”, “More Examples, Less Theory: Historical Studies of Writing Psychology”, article “Why academics can’t write”.

Prof. Майкл Биллиг- Академик Британской академии наук, почетный профессор социальных наук в Университете Лафборо (Англия). Его научная работа сосредоточена в основном в области современной социальной психологии, хотя большая часть его работ выходит за рамки дисциплинарных границ в социальных науках. В его исследовании были изучены другие способы исследования социально-психологических проблем. Является автором книг “Учитесь писать плохо: как добиться успеха в социальных науках”, “Больше примеров, меньше теории: исторические исследования письменной психологии”, статьи “Почему ученые не могут писать”.

  • Share:
Admin

SEARCH

SUBMISSIONS

  • Media
  • Papers

Recent Posts

Sources as Fundamental Pillars of Science
Sources as Fundamental Pillars of Science
27Дек,2020
Are Sources of Church History Reliable?
Are Sources of Church History Reliable?
27Дек,2020
The manipulation of data in science: challenges of assessing results received through quantitative and qualitative methods
The manipulation of data in science: challenges of assessing results received through quantitative and qualitative methods
27Дек,2020
‘Scholarly Credibility’: current trends and challenges
‘Scholarly Credibility’: current trends and challenges
27Дек,2020

About conference

Credible sources of information have become an urgent matter in this era. With the increasing level of accessibility to sources, which we could have only dreamed of before the invention of the internet and the emergence of social networks, we face an utterly distinct task. At any given moment, we may encounter a piece of data that is not factual or labeled as such. This relates to all kinds of sources and "levels," starting from social media and ending with scientific works published by highly reputable entities.

Get in touch

 info@euasu.org

Useful Links

  • About us
  • Sponsors
  • Contacts
  • Partners

Social Links

  • Linkedin
  • Youtube

International conference

Copyright 2021 © Challenges of source evaluation in science and correlated areas.

  • Home
  • Privacy
  • Cookie
  • Terms and conditions